| Situation of health promotion after established the FHS |
Potencialities | Identification of the situation of population health [17] [30] Home visits [15] [20] [22] [26] [30] [31] [32] Health education activities [11] [12] [14] [15] [19] [25] [27] [30] [31] [33] Support groups [13] [14] [15] [17] [19] [23] [29] Intervention with families [21] [28] Health Agent as a category of the most prominent teams [28] 100% of population coverage [30] Housing in the same work area [16] [30] Reorientation of health services [23] Reinforcement of community action [21] Job integration in teams and among sectors [16] [17] [23] Reduction of number of hospital internment [32] |
Weaknesses | Integrality in family care neglected [17] [26] inadequate infrastructure [27] [33] Dissatisfaction of professionals [27] [28] Unsuitable materials and equipment for use [27] Model curative [22] [27] Assistance focused only on the prevention [28] Limitation of individual abilities for self-care and community mobilization [33] The actions are still organized in a normative reference, biomedical and non-dialogical [11] Number of home visits less than the recommended [13] Absence or lack of medical professional commitment in the promotion activities [13] [31] Absence or lack of health promotion activities [12] [19] [24] [28] Absence of reorientation of health services [19] Confusion between the concepts of promotion and prevention [18] [22] |
Challenges | Professional qualification [25] Promotion in the FHS is still a construction process [23] |