Situation of health promotion after established the FHS

Potencialities

Ÿ Identification of the situation of population health [17] [30]

Ÿ Home visits [15] [20] [22] [26] [30] [31] [32]

Ÿ Health education activities [11] [12] [14] [15] [19] [25] [27] [30] [31] [33]

Ÿ Support groups [13] [14] [15] [17] [19] [23] [29]

Ÿ Intervention with families [21] [28]

Ÿ Health Agent as a category of the most prominent teams [28]

Ÿ 100% of population coverage [30]

Ÿ Housing in the same work area [16] [30]

Ÿ Reorientation of health services [23]

Ÿ Reinforcement of community action [21]

Ÿ Job integration in teams and among sectors [16] [17] [23]

Ÿ Reduction of number of hospital internment [32]

Weaknesses

Ÿ Integrality in family care neglected [17] [26]

Ÿ inadequate infrastructure [27] [33]

Ÿ Dissatisfaction of professionals [27] [28]

Ÿ Unsuitable materials and equipment for use [27]

Ÿ Model curative [22] [27]

Ÿ Assistance focused only on the prevention [28]

Ÿ Limitation of individual abilities for self-care and community mobilization [33]

Ÿ The actions are still organized in a normative reference, biomedical and non-dialogical [11]

Ÿ Number of home visits less than the recommended [13]

Ÿ Absence or lack of medical professional commitment in the promotion activities [13] [31]

Ÿ Absence or lack of health promotion activities [12] [19] [24] [28]

Ÿ Absence of reorientation of health services [19]

Ÿ Confusion between the concepts of promotion and prevention [18] [22]

Challenges

Ÿ Professional qualification [25]

Ÿ Promotion in the FHS is still a construction process [23]