Questions | Number of responses per item | |
Semester 2015.1 | Semester 2016.1 | |
1) Did you have any difficulty understanding the two theoretical parts taught in the last two classes? |
|
|
( ) None. | 5 | 1 |
( ) Little. | 9 | 19 |
( ) A lot. | 1 | 0 |
2) Did you have any difficulty doing the calculations requested in the last two days of class activities? |
|
|
( ) None. | 12 | 2 |
( ) Little. | 3 | 17 |
( ) A lot. | 0 | 1 |
3) Did you find any similarity between the calculation methods with the use of the effectiveness factor and without it? |
|
|
( ) Yes. | 7 | 8 |
( ) Some. | 7 | 11 |
( ) None, they were quite different. | 0 | 0 |
| 1. Not answered | 1. Not answered |
4) How do you prefer the evaluations in the Chemical Reactor Design discipline: four or five in-class activities or a single traditional exam? |
|
|
( ) I prefer four or five in-class activities. | 14 | 16 |
( ) I prefer a traditional exam. | 0 | 0 |
( ) Some other type of evaluation. Please, describe such other evaluation. | Only one student described another type of evaluation, which as follows: The in-class activities are quite productive; however, I suggest using a more detailed chemical reactor design for evaluation. | 4. Exam and activity. |