What is the manager’s (respondent) opinion on Virtual Project Management (VPM) Operational Effectivity described below? | VE | E | SE | LE | NE |
2.1. LEADERSHIP STYLE (PEACE) | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1) Personality: Motivating and maintaining a good attitude toward each project team member. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2) Experience: It can quickly adapt and resolve situational changes. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
3) Availability: Easy approach and anytime can be contacted. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
4) Communication: Contacting and coordinating often thru email or phone for the project team, e.g., to a virtual team (vT). | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
5) Engagement: Involve, meet, and visit personally; to check and confirm the status of the project deliverables assigned to each functional team. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2.2. DESIGN PLANNING (BORE) | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1) Budget: Buffer/contingency and considering miscellaneous in operation. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2) Operation: Optimize and continuous improvement processes to achieve better output. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
3) Risk: Dealing with problems, including disputes from each functional discipline area. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
4) Explore: Application to achieve and strategies to address an internal/external issue. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2.3 FUNCTIONAL MANAGEMENT (STAFF) | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1) Structure: Organizational support, such as technical staff and workforce for the specific project. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2) Train: Teach and train to improve and maintain the competency of each discipline for achieving objectives and goals in operation. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
3) Achievement: Team recognition and reward or additional benefits per the project completion, each discipline aside from the overall program. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
4) Flexibility: Flexible assignment and specialty, if possible, to perform the task. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
5) File-Handling: Keeping and storing deliverable data safely under confidentiality. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2.4. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (ACES) | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1) Ability: Task over time, determining each project’s technical familiarity, capability, and understanding level. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
2) Completion: Completing the task as per the contract and project requirements. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
3) Efficient: Meeting the client’s expectations as required in the project. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
4) System: Calibrating and checking the overall design as part of the quality standard. | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |