Ref. No.

Period

Datasets

Algorithm

Accurateness (%)

[16]

2022

WDBC and BCCD

SVM, LR, KNN and EC

99.3%, 98.06%, 97.35%, and 97.61%

[3]

2022

WDBC

KNN, SVM, LR and Random Forest Tree (RFT)

91.25%, 92.5%, 93.75% and 95%

[17]

2022

Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco.

SVM, KNN, LR and NB

90.6%, 86.1%, 80.6% and 51.7%

[2]

2021

WDBC

LR, SVM, KNN, DT Classifier, RF Classifier and NB Classifier.

98.2%, 98.2%, 96.8%, 91.4%, 97.4% and 97.1%

[18]

2021

UCSB and BreakHis

c and ANN

89.1% and 86.27%

[19]

2020

WDBC

LR and DT

94.4% and 95.1%

[14]

2020

(WBC) and (WDBC)

NB, SVM, KNN and LR,

92%, 96%, 97% and 99% (WBC) and 96%, 94%, 96% and 98% (WDBC)

[12]

2020

WBC

NB, LR, and Neural Networks (NN)

95% training and 93% testing and 98% training and 97% testing

[20]

2019

WDBC

DT and KNN

92% and 95.95%

[13]

2019

WBCD

MLP, KNN, CART, Gaussian Naive Bayes (NB) and SVM

99.12%, 95.61%, 93.85% 94.73% and 98.24%

[21]

2019

WDBC

Kernel SVM, LR

KNN, DT, NB and RF

98.24%, 96.49%,95.61%,88.59%,85.09% and 92.98%

[10]

2018

WBC

NB and KNN

96.19% and 97.51%

[14]

2018

BCCD and WBCD

DT, SVM, RF, LR, NN DT, SVM, RF, LR, NN

68.3%, 76.3%, 78.5%, 73.7%, 74.8% (BCCD), 96.3%, 97.7%, 98.9%, 98.1%, 98.5% (WBCD)

[22]

2017

BCD

NB and KNN

96.19% and 97.51%

[5]

2016

WBC

SVM, Bayesian Networks (BN), and RF

96.6%, 99.2%, and 99.9%

[23]

2013

WDBC

K-SVM (Hybrid), ACO-SVM, GA-SVM and PSO-SVM

97.38%, 95.96%, 97.19% and 97.37%