| Five Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) | Mullins- Sweatt, Edmundson, Sauer- Zavala, Lynam, Miller, & Widiger (2012) |
| 1) Anxious Uncertainty 2) Dysregulated Anger 3) Despondence 4) Self-Disturbance 5) Behaviour Dysregulation 6) Affective Dysregulation 7) Fragility 8) Dissociative Tendencies 9) Distrustfulness 10) Manipulativeness 11) Oppositional 12) Rashness | The FFBI subscales were shown to have good internal consistency— Mullins-Sweat, Edmundson, Sauer-Zavala, Lynam, Miller, & Widiger (2012) | The FFBI subscales were shown to have good convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity—Mullins-Sweat, Edmundson, Sauer-Zavala, Lynam, Miller, & Widiger (2012) |
Paranoid | Paranoid Personality Disorder Features Questionnaire. | Useda, 2002 | 23 | 1) Mistrust/ suspiciousness 2) Antagonism 3) Introversion 4) Hypersensitivity 5) Hypervigilance 6) Rigidity | The test-retest reliability of the six PPDFQ scores over a 6-week interval was good, and the hypothesised relationships between the PPDFQ subscales and the five-factor model of personality as well as Livesley’s dimensional model of personality pathology were supported—Bernstein & Useda, 2007. |
|
Avoidant | UNABLE TO FIND |
|
|
|
|
|
Schizoid | Interpersonal Measure of Schizoid Personality Disorder (IM-SZ) | Kosson, Blackburn, Byrnes, Park, Logan, & Donnelly (2008) | 12 |
| Internal consistency estimates were high, with coefficient alpha equal to .88. Corrected item-to-total correlations ranged from .40 to .74, and a mean interitem correlation of .41 suggests homogeneity for the IM-SZ. Interrater agreement was estimated with an average, one-way random effects ICC, based on 123 cases in which interviewer and observer ratings were available, and was acceptable, r = .69, indicating that the traits measured are relatively robust across raters. Individual item ICCs were somewhat lower; the mean item ICC was .53—Kosson, Blackburn, Byrnes, Park, Logan, & Donnelly, 2008. | Results provide preliminary indications that the measure of SZPD correlates with other measures in specific ways that suggest preliminary construct validity. Scores on the IM-SZ appear independent of age, education, and SES yet correlated negatively with IQ. Similarly, IM-SZ scores were generally independent of criminal activity yet correlated in predicted ways with ratings on several components of psychopathy—Kosson, Blackburn, Byrnes, Park, Logan, & Donnelly, 2008. |
Passive- Aggressive |
|
|
|
|
|
|