Theorist | Year | Criteria in urban public spaces |
Jacobs J. [14] | 1961 | Order activity on visual order, mixed use, permeability, possibility of monitoring and caring, diversity and richness of activities, paying attention to Streets, the possibility of social incorporation, the richness of activities, flexibility. |
Lynch K. [15] | 1981 | Compatibility, access and control, efficiency, equity, social vitality |
Violich F. [16] | 1983 | Readability of the environment, freedom of choice, contrasting urban forms, able to deliver the voice of past, to listen to the voices of the past, paying attention to the native-region link. |
Bentley I. [17] | 1985 | Permeability, variety, flexibility, permeability, variability (form), readability, flexibility, visual adaptability, richness, possibility of personalizing. |
Trancik R. [18] | 1986 | Keeping the movement connections, focusing on spaces, continuity of the edges, controlling the axis of vision and perspective, combining of the internal and external spaces. |
Greene S. [19] | 1992 | Access and communication, diversity of users, security, consistency, clarity, coherence, identity of unity, character, charm of scale, proportion of visual function, vitality. |
Haughton G, Hunter C. [20] | 1994 | Democracy, permeability, security, economy and its tools, consultation and participation of users, flexibility |
Punter J. V, Carmona M. [21] | 1997 | Land use, pedestrian movement, patterns of behavior, riding movement flow, permeability, public perception, qualitative evaluations, operations, concept recalling, objective perspective, synthetic form |
Pakzad J. [22] | 2007 | Safety, vitality, space, flexibility. |
Habibi S. M. [23] | 2010 | Diversity, safety and security, compatibility, social role, distinction and character, legibility, permanence, spatial contrast, turning points, pausing places, human scale, flexibility, weather conditions |