Open ditch | 86% are open | Open ditches have high risk of accidents than closed. It facilitates residents to collect water as no other method is provided to them | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
Covered ditch | 14% of ditches are covered | More business space is created by closed-ditch option while minimizing accidents to motorists and walkers | 6 | 9 | 10 | 9 |
Road side toilets | No public toilet along road | Impacts on walkers from countryside. Local custom allows walkers to use toilet of business. Lesson for future projects | 0 | 0 | 8 | 5 |
Space for business | Space for roadside business is inadequate. A covered ditch option is more suited in this situation | Lesson for future design | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Road signs | Rehabilitated road has basic road signs but incomplete. User awareness and education on road signs is important, which is not conducted | Absence of such an education program impacts all users. Issue with high impact on walkers and motorists | 8 | 6 | 9 | 10 |
User education | No program for user education on road signs, ditch clean up, extracting water from ditch and, tree planting and management | User education on road signs, watering and tree pruning are important. It should be part of road rehabilitation | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Disable friendly road | Rehabilitated road section does not consider issues of disable people. No access ramps, sitting areas or rails to facilitate disable walkers | Disable people not able to use road facility without being assisted by a non-disable person | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Bus-stop | Rehabilitated section has only 3 bus-stops. Community leaders request at least 3 more stops. Section had 5 bus-stops before | No dialogue between designer and community leaders. Lesson for future | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
All |
|
| 95 | 86 | 82 | 48 |