Author (Year) | Study Design | Subjects | Methods | Results | |||
Rosenstock (2012) | Randomized Double-blind Placebo- controlled Parallel-group | 451 T2DM (236M; 215F) | (Stable dose of MET ≥ 3 months)
Pre-treatment Screening Period: 3 - 4 weeks
Double-Blind Treatment Period: 12 weeks
Group A: placebo daily
Group B: CANA 50 mg daily
Group C: CANA 100 mg daily
Group D: CANA 200 mg daily
Group E: CANA 300 mg once daily
Group F: CANA 300 mg twice daily
Group G: SITA 100 mg daily
Post-treatment Period: 2 weeks | HbA1C (%) at 12 Weeks | |||
Baseline Mean ± SD | LS Mean Change | Difference vs. PBO | |||||
PBO (N = 65) | 7.75 ± 0.83 | −0.22 | - | ||||
CANA 50 mg (N = 64) | 8.00 ± 0.99 | −0.79* | - | ||||
CANA 100 mg (N = 64) | 7.83 ± 0.96 | −0.76* | - | ||||
CANA 200 mg (N = 65) | 7.61 ± 0.80 | −0.70* | - | ||||
CANA 300 mg QD (N = 64) | 7.69 ± 1.02 | −0.92* | - | ||||
CANA 300 mg BID (N = 64) | 7.73 ± 0.89 | −0.95* | - | ||||
SITA 100 mg | 7.64 ± 0.95 | −0.74* | - | ||||
*p < 0.001 vs. PBO | |||||||
FPG (mg/dL) at 12 Weeks | |||||||
Baseline Mean ± SD | LS Mean Change | Difference vs. PBO | |||||
PBO (N = 65) | 164 ± 38 | 3.6 | - | ||||
CANA 50 mg (N = 64) | 170 ± 45 | −16.2* | - | ||||
CANA 100 mg (N = 64) | 168 ± 42 | −25.2* | - | ||||
CANA 200 mg (N = 65) | 160 ± 37 | −27.0* | - | ||||
CANA 300 mg QD (N = 64) | 159 ± 44 | −25.2* | - | ||||
CANA 300 mg BID (N = 64) | 157 ± 34 | −23.4* | - | ||||
SITA 100 mg | 158 ± 42 | −12.6 | - | ||||
*p < 0.001 vs. PBO | |||||||
Body Weight (kg) at 12 Weeks | |||||||
Baseline Mean ± SD | LS Mean Percent Change | Difference vs. PBO | |||||
PBO (N = 65) | 85.9 ± 19.5 | −1.1 | - | ||||
CANA 50 mg (N = 64) | 87.6 ± 16.3 | −2.3* | - | ||||
CANA 100 mg (N = 64) | 87.7 ± 15.5 | −2.6* | - | ||||
CANA 200 mg (N = 65) | 87.7 ± 17.0 | −2.7* | - | ||||
CANA 300 mg QD (N = 64) | 87.3 ± 15.9 | −3.4* | - | ||||
CANA 300 mg BID (N = 64) | 86.0 ± 19.7 | −3.4* | - | ||||
SITA 100 mg | 87.2 ± 18.0 | −0.6 | - | ||||
*p < 0.001 vs. PBO |