Critical Appraisal Skills Program Checklist (Section A & B) | Literature | |||||||
Teo et al., 2019 | Cummings, Kong, & Orminski, 2020 | Siu, 2018 | McIntyre, Zecevic, & Diachun, 2014 | Rikin et al., 2018 | Kaljee et al., 2017 | Briggs et al., 2019 | Sun et al., 2020 | |
1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Can’t Tell |
3. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | Can’t Tell | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
5. Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | x | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
6. Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered? | Can’t Tell | Can’t Tell | Can’t Tell | ✓ | Can’t Tell | Can’t Tell | ✓ | Can’t Tell |
7. Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |