| Facial Recognition Responsible Use Index (FRRU-I) | |||||||||
| Section | Topic | N˚ | Indicator | Weight | Assumption supporting positive score | ||||
| 1 | General | 1 | Period of use | 1 | Respondent provided a detailed answer | ||||
| 2 | Distribution | 1 | Respondent provided a detailed answer | ||||||
| 3 | Regulation | 1.5 | Local law governs the use of FR systems | ||||||
| 2 | Software | 4 | Legal ownership | 1 | Compliance with public procurement rules (if the concessionary company is a public company) | ||||
| 5 | Name of the owner | 1 | Respondent provided a detailed answer | ||||||
| 6 | Name of the software | 1 | Respondent provided a detailed answer | ||||||
| 7 | Annual cost | 1 | Respondent provided a detailed answer | ||||||
| 3 | Implementation | 8 | Technical studies | 1 | Before contracting and implementing the technology, technical studies were demanded | ||||
| 9 | Training | 1 | Public/private servers involved in the implementation and daily usage of the technology received training | ||||||
| 4 | Data Protection | 10 | Adequacy | 1.5 | At least one measure was taken to bring the transportation service into compliance with LGPD | ||||
| 11 | Impact Reports | 1.5 | Impact reports were produced | ||||||
| 12 | Responsible for data processing | 1.5 | Respondent cited the name of the responsible for data processing | ||||||
| 13 | Security measures | 1.5 | Personal data protection measures exist | ||||||
| 14 | Collection of consent | 1.5 | Consent is collected | ||||||
| 15 | Accessing data/ Revoking consent | 1.5 | There is at least one mechanism that allows personal data subjects to access their data and/or to revoke their consent to data processing | ||||||
| 16 | Personal data sharing | 1.5 | No sharing or it happens only under judicial request | ||||||
| 5 | Fraud Checking | 17 | Human intervention | 1 | Respondent detailed how human intervention works | ||||
| 18 | Moral constraint | 2 | The warning of possible fraud is done discreetly | ||||||
| 19 | Reviewing outputs | 1 | When fraud is contested, the second check is different from the first one | ||||||
| 20 | References | 1 | Respondent provided details on how the process was structured | ||||||
| 6 | Relationship with users | 21 | Restriction of rights | 2 | Even when the system detects possible fraud, users can conclude their journey | ||||
| 22 | Physical constraint | 2 | Contestation for possible fraud can be presented either in-person or online | ||||||
| 23 | N˚ of frauds and contestation | 1 | Respondent provided detailed quantitative information | ||||||
| Score-Range: From [−30] to [+30] | |||||||||
| Facial Recognition Responsible Use Scale (FRRU-S) - Levels | |||||||||
| Very Low From [−30] to [−19] | Low From [−18] to [−7] | Intermediary From [−6] to [+6] | High From [+7] to [+18] | Very High From [+19] to [+30] | |||||