Sub-variables | Components of each sub-variable | Expected Score | Score obtained | Percentage |
Structure | Existence of financial support | 3 | 3 | 100 |
Infrastructure | 2 | 2 | 100 | |
Management materials | 2 | 2 | 100 | |
Technical tools | 9 | 9 | 100 | |
Communication tools | 5 | 5 | 100 | |
Target Tracking Sheet | 5 | 5 | 100 | |
TOTAL | 26 | 26 | 100 | |
Process | Setting up the research team | 2 | 2 | 100 |
Setting up the management team | 5 | 5 | 100 | |
Setting up the technical team | 4 | 4 | 100 | |
Resources mobilized on time | 3 | 3 | 100 | |
Report writing | 1 | 1 | 100 | |
Training of actors | 4 | 4 | 100 | |
Follow-up with nutritionists, sports teachers and peer educators | 14* | 14* | 100 | |
Implementation of nutrition education activities | 30** | 30** | 100 | |
Organization of culinary demonstration sessions | 18*** | 18*** | 100 | |
Organization of physical activity sessions | 240 | 205 | 85 | |
Organization of daily physical activity sessions | 52 | 47 | 90 | |
Organization of physical activity sessions weeklies | 12 | 12 | 100 | |
Organization of physical activity sessions Monthly | 360**** | 347 | 96 | |
TOTAL | 727 | 692 | 95 | |
Results | Nutritionists capable of conducting nutrition awareness and education activities | 6 | 6 | 100 |
Sport teachers able to coach beneficiaries for physical activities | 4 | 4 | 100 | |
Peer educators capable of close monitoring | 18 | 18 | 100 | |
Health workers capable of caring for diabetic subjects | 35 | 35 | 100 | |
Informed and motivated leaders | 4 | 4 | 100 | |
% beneficiaries using the new culinary demonstration practices | 90 | 82 | 91 | |
% reduction in high-calorie meals in favour of vegetables | 90 | 80 | 89 | |
% of beneficiaries who practiced at least 150 minutes of physical activity per week | 90 | 73 | 81 | |
% of beneficiaries who reduced tobacco use | 90 | 62 | 69 | |
% of beneficiaries who reduced alcohol consumption | 90 | 59 | 65 | |
% of beneficiaries who participated in all planned activities | 90 | 72 | 80 | |
Rate of good perception of beneficiaries on the conduct of the sessions | 90 | 80 | 89 | |
| % satisfaction of beneficiaries | 90 | 90 | 100 |
% of satisfaction of the actors | 65 | 65 | 100 | |
% of satisfaction of the political-administrative authorities | 15 | 15 | 100 | |
% of taxpayer satisfaction | 01 | 01 | 100 | |
TOTAL | 835 | 713 | 85,4 |