factors

Number of cases

Minimum

Maximum value

Average value

Too much intervention by the owner

272

1

5

3.82

Change more

272

1

5

3.69

The owner delays the payment of the project payment

272

1

5

3.86

Multiple majors working at the same time cause work-face conflicts

272

1

5

3.30

The construction party misunderstood the design documents

272

1

5

3.43

Use of new technologies, new materials and new processes in construction

272

1

5

2.67

Unreasonable construction schedule

272

1

5

3.51

Construction progress is delayed

272

1

5

3.56

Security incident

272

1

5

3.63

Inexperience of subcontractors

272

1

5

3.67

Lack of awareness of high-tech and smart construction

272

1

5

3.20

Incomplete design drawings

272

1

5

3.83

Errors in design drawings

272

1

5

3.94

Inadequate designer skills and experience

272

1

5

3.73

Design work ignores buildability

272

1

5

3.70

Design schedule delays

272

1

5

3.64

Unfamiliar with laws, regulations and policies

272

1

5

3.32

Ignore local resource constraints

272

1

5

3.50

Uncertainty and changes in the surrounding environment

272

1

5

3.46

The buyer’s logistics management ability is poor

272

1

5

3.37

Material/equipment supply delays

272

1

5

3.47

Low contract price

272

1

5

3.85

There is no clear definition or description of the work of the interface class

272

1

5

3.48

Lack of communication between participants

272

1

5

3.61

Participants lack trust

272

1

5

3.53

Participants lack a sense of cooperation

272

1

5

3.58

Participants have different cultures or backgrounds

272

1

5

2.99

Missing or outdated information

272

1

5

3.24

Poor information processing ability

272

1

5

3.27

Insufficient information sharing

272

1

5

3.25

Organizational chao

272

1

5

3.71

Incomplete staffing

272

1

5

3.49

Lack of effective management and unified command

272

1

5

3.80

Lack of effective oversight

272

1

5

3.43