Title

Authors and country [ref.]

Context of care and sample size (target group; intervention/ control)

Teamcare intervention

Effect based on primary outcome

*Team work

Main Goal

Main Strategy

Main Content

Effects of structured versus usual care on renal endpoint in type 2 diabetes: the SURE study: a randomized multicenter translational study

Chan et al. 2009, China [26]

Medical (diabetes; 104/101)

Adherence

Monitoring

Education

Yes, reduced the need for dialyses

Multi

aA randomized controlled trial of a health promotion education programme for people with multiple sclerosis

Ennis et al. 2006, UK [27]

Medical (multiple sclerosis; 32/30)

Self-care behavior

Self-efficacy

Comprehensive learning

Yes, improved health-promoting behaviour

Multi

aImpact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial

Gade et al. 2008, USA [28]

Medical (life-limiting illnesses; 275/237)

Patient satisfaction

Dialogue

Support

Yes, greater satisfaction with care

Inter

A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial

Jack et al. 2009, USA [29]

Medical (general medicine; 370/368)

Prevention

Care plans

Advice

Yes, decreased rehospitalization

Inter

aCostly patients with unexplained medical symptoms: a high-risk population

Margalit and El-Ad, 2008, Israel [30]

Medical (unexplained symptoms; 21/21)

Prevention

Dialogue

Comprehensive learning

Yes, decline in visits to medical settings

Multi

aMultidisciplinary patient education in groups increases knowledge on osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial

Nielsen et al. 2008, Denmark [31]

Medical (osteoporosis; 141/128)

Self- management

Empowerment

Education

Yes, increased patient knowledge on osteoporosis

Multi

aPatient education in groups increases knowledge of osteoporosis and adherence to treatment: a two-year randomized controlled trial

Nielsen et al. 2010, Denmark [32]

Medical (osteoporosis; 136/130)

Adherence

Empowerment

Education

Yes, increased knowledge and adherence to treatment

Multi

aA randomised controlled clinical trial of nurse-, dietitian- and pedagogist-led Group Care for the management of Type 2 diabetes

Trento et al. 2008, Italy [33]

Medical (diabetes; 25/24)

Prevention

Dialogue

Care- management

Yes, improved metabolic control

Multi

Five-year follow-up findings from a randomized controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure

Austin et al. 2008, UK [34]

Cardiac (heart failure; 57/55)

QoL

Follow-up

Comprehensive learning

Yes, no deterioration in walking distance

Multi

aLessons learned from a multidisciplinary heart failure clinic for older women: a randomised controlled trial

Azad et al. 2008, Canada [35]

Cardiac (heart failure; 45/46)

QoL

Dialogue

Comprehensive learning

No effect on heart-failure specific QoL

Multi

aCan a heart failure-specific cardiac rehabilitation program decrease hospitalizations and improve outcomes in high-risk patients?

Davidson et al. 2010, Australia [36]

Cardiac (heart failure; 53/52)

Self- management

Empowerment

Comprehensive learning

Yes, reduced readmissions rates

Multi

Lack of long-term benefits of a 6-month heart failure disease management program

Nguyen et al. 2007, Canada [37]

Cardiac (heart failure; 94/96)

Prevention

Assessment

Disease- management

No long-term effect on readmissions

Multi

Two-year outcome of a prospective, controlled study of a disease management programme for elderly patients with heart failure

Sindaco et al. 2007, Italy [38]

Cardiac (heart failure; 86/87)

Prevention

Care plan

Disease- management

Yes, decreased number of readmissions

Multi

aNurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial

Wood et al. 2008, UK [39]

Cardiac (cardiovascular; 1189/1128)

Prevention

Monitoring

Counselling

Yes, reduced risk of cardiovascular disease

Multi