Authors (year)

Sample

(Period)

Environmental variables

Econometric specification

Estimation technique (s)

Results

Selected studies that confirm the EKC

Pata [18]

Turkey

(1974-2014)

CO2 emissions

Quadratic

ARDL, FMOLS and CCR

ECK is valid with turning points between 13,523 and 14,077 USD

Hanif [19]

34 SSA countries

(1995-2015)

CO2 emissions

Quadratic

System GMM

EKC is confirmed

Ahmad et al. [20]

India

(1971-2014)

Aggregated and disaggregated CO2

Quadratic

ARDL bounds testing and causality test

Confirmed for aggregated and disaggregate CO2 indicators

Heidari et al. [21]

Five ASEAN countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand

Carbon dioxide

PSTR

EKC is supported for the panel.

Selected studies that reject the EKC

Zoundi [22]

25 SSA countries

(1980-2012)

CO2 emissions

Quadratic

Dynamic OLS, Syst GMM, DFE, MG, PMG

Monotonic increasing relationship.

Abid [23]

23 SSA African countries

(199-2010)

CO2 emissions

Quadratic

Static (Pooled OLS, RE, FE) and dynamic (diff GMM, syst GMM and LSDVC) panel techniques

Monotonic increasing relationship.

Allard et al. [24]

74 countries

(1994-2012)

CO2 emissions

Cubic

Quantile regression

N-shaped relationship.

Selected studies that provided mixed results

Keho [25]

59 countries from different regions and periods:

SSA and MENA (1976-2011)

America, Asia and Europe (1971-2011)

CO2 emissions

Quadratic

Quantile regression

EKC is confirmed for SSA, American and European countries at all quantiles.

EKC is valid for Asian and MENA countries only at lower levels of CO2 emissions.

Alam et al. [26]

Brazil, China, India and Indonesia (1970-2012)

CO2 emissions

Linear and quadratic

ARDL bounds testing

EKC is confirmed only in Brazil, China and Indonesia and rejected for India.