Instrument

General description

Reliability data

validity data

Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (Goodglass, Kaplan, & Barresi, 2000)

Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, Third Edition is composed 50 subtests that allow both a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of language including speech melody, fluency, anomia, and syntactic organization and paraphasia types.

Internal reliability coefficients range from acceptable to high across subtests; alpha coefficients for Sentence Repetition and Boston Naming are greater than .95, while Word-Picture Matching is less than .65a,c

Convergent validity varies with subtest, with correlations of .86 and .93, for the auditory comprehensive measure with the Token Test and with Porch Index of Communicative Ability (Divenyi & Robinson, 1989) a,c

Reitan-Indiana Aphasia Screening Test (Reitan & Wolfson, 1993)

Assesses symbolic-language related deficits such as, difficulties in reading, writing, naming, arithmetic, and repeating words and phrases. The test asks the patient to perform a series of tasks such as naming common objects, spelling simple words, identifying individual numbers and letters, reading writing/enunciating/understanding spoken language, identifying body parts, calculating simple arithmetic problems, differentiating between right and left, and copying simple shapes.

Review of the studies of Halstead-Reitan Battery suggest that the available data indicate adequate internal and test-retest reliability (Bornstein et al., 1987) a,c

Discriminant function analyses of the Aphasia and Sensory-perceptual Examination which permitted classification of subjects into their appropriate groups with the same degree of accuracy as achieved using the rest of the Halstead-Reitan Battery (Reitan & Wolson, 1993) a,c