Author/ Publication year | Country | Study Design | Study population/ setting | Intervention | Outcomes | Notes | ||||||||
Chu 2010 (14) | New York, USA | Retrospective cohort study. Data collected for years 2005-2008 | Non-pregnant HIV positive adults 18+ years on cART in community-based primary care network (CB) (n = 178) vs. a large tertiary care center and teaching hospital (HB) (n = 237) | CB: non-HIV-expert PCP in collaboration with accredited HIV specialists (all general internal/family medicine-trained) vs. HB: ID-trained clinicians | CB | HB | Fewer patients initiating cART than needed for statistical significance. Data were adjusted for patients’ characteristics. | |||||||
VL | adj OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.63. | |||||||||||||
CD4 count | adj OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.21 | |||||||||||||
Gardner 2002 (21) | USA | Cross-sectional analysis. Data collected for years 1998-1999 | HIV-infected women (n = 273) | HIV-specialist care vs. non-HIV-specialist care. | HIV-specialist | Non-HIV-specialist | Self-reported use of ART. Analysis for use of ART was adjusted for significant predictors that led women to use HIV-specialist care. Provider type based on self-report by patients. Data on types of ART use were adjusted for patients’ characteristics. All other data, no adjustment was stated. | |||||||
ART use | - -CD4 cell count < 200 (P = 0.6) - -CD4 cell count 200 - 500 (P ≤ 0.001) - -CD4 cell count > 500 (P = 0.45) - -All CD4 cell count groups (P < 0.001) | |||||||||||||
PJP | - -CD4 cell count < 100/mm3 (P = 0.19) | |||||||||||||
Horberg 2012 (15) | California, USA | Retrospective cohort analysis. Data collected for years 1996-2006 | HIV-infected patients initiating a new cART regimen (n = 7.071) or initiating a second or later cART (n = 3730) in an integrated healthcare system | Non-ID/non-HIV-expert PCP vs. non-ID but HIV-expert PCP vs. ID specialists vs. HIV-trained NP/PA | Non-ID/ non-HIV expert | Non-ID, HIV expert | ID specialist | NP/ PA | All data were adjusted for clustering effect and patients’ characteristics. Clinicians with more HIV caseload (adj P = 0.03) and experience (adj P = 0.003) was significant in VL success after 12 months of cART initiation among ART-naïve patients but not ART-experienced patients (caseload: adj P = 0.96; experience: adj P = 0.98). | |||||
VL | Undetectable at 12 months in: - -ART-naïve patients (adj P = 0.36) - -ART-experienced patients (adj P = 0.80) | |||||||||||||
ART adherence | - -ART-naïve patients (adj P = 0.97) - -ART-experienced patients (adj P = 0.66) | |||||||||||||
Landon 2003 (16) | USA | Prospective cohort study. Data collected for years 1998-1999 | Non-institutionalized HIV patients participating in a research study (n = 1820). | ID-trained physicians vs. GM HIV-expert physicians vs. GM non-HIV-expert physicians | ID physician | GM HIV-expert | GM non-HIV expert | All data were adjusted for patients’ characteristics. | ||||||
Appropriate cART therapy at 12 & 18 months after first protease inhibitor approval | - -GM (HIV-expert and non-HIV-expert) vs. ID physicians: adj OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.95 - -non-HIV-expert GM vs. ID physicians: adj OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.61 - -HIV-expert GM vs. ID physicians: adj OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.10. - -Low-volume physicians vs. high-volume physicians OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.48 | |||||||||||||