6 | Bus driver– passengers | Conversations between bus driver and passengers reduce accident risk, but also reduce concentration | Interactions around bus stop affect to accessibility | Elderly, negative passenger have effects on mental fatigue and satisfaction of bus drivers | Interaction affects to DB & fuel cost | Effect of communication on ridership attraction | Communications (bus driver, ticket collector) generate noise in bus | Information provision from bus driver to passengers | Promotion of use of bus increases interactions |
7 | Bus driver- other vehicles | Age, inattention, village culture, and drink-driving behaviors affect the perception of the bus driver | Perception of bus driver affects to DB & accessibility around bus stop | Mixed traffic flow conditions are positively correlated with the levels of driving fatigue of the bus driver | Perception and DB affects to fuel and operating cost | Effect on average speed of bus | Heterogeneous traffic flows, horn events increase noise level by 0.5 - 13 dB as compared to homogeneous | Planning of bus lanes affects interactions | Restrictive policies reduce interactions |
8 | Bus driver- other road users | Age, gender, inattention, and drink-driving behaviors affect bus driver perception and DB | Interaction affects to DB & accessibility around bus stop | Slow drivers, pedestrians & over cutting make bus driver angry or frustrated | Perception and DB affects to fuel and operating cost | Affecting average speed of bus | Driver’s bus honk induces noise | Planning bus lane affects interactions | Restrictive policies reduce interactions |
9 | Bus driver- environment | Poor infrastructure system, bad road terrain, inattention increase risk and severity of accident | Perception and manner of stopping of bus drivers in proximity of bus stops | Road conditions affect the satisfaction of bus drivers | Perception and DB affects to fuel and operating cost | Perception of bus driver affects the average speed of bus | Perception affects to DB, generates emission & noise | Failure to stop bus at bus stop because of its poor conditions and unplanned stopping of bus | Public investment increases interaction |
10 | Passenger- passenger | Security against crime, driverless shuttle buses, staff behavior are most important criteria for encouraging bus commuters | The presence of passengers standing inside the bus increases the boarding time | Too many passengers cause unwanted arousal & emotional states that reduce passenger satisfaction | Interaction time when they get on/off affect to fuel & operating cost | Excessively overcrowded buses may drive away anxious travelers | Communication between passenger and passenger cause air pollution and noise | Condition of bus stop and hub, information provision affect to interaction | A promotional policy increases the complexity of interaction |
11 | Passengers- other vehicles | Other vehicles affect to safety when passenger get on or get off at bus stop | Other vehicles affect passenger when they get on/off at bus stop | Perception affects comfort, satisfaction | Interaction time when they get on/off affect to fuel & operating cost | The condition of other vehicles affects ridership | Interaction when getting on/off affects to DB, emission & noise | Location and condition of bus stop affect to interaction when getting on/off | A restrictive policy reduces interactions |
12 | Passengers- other road users | Passengers’ behaviors affect other’s DB behavior, safety | Perception of others affect to passengers when getting on/off | Perception affects comfort, satisfaction | Interaction time when they get on/off affect to fuel & operating cost | The conditions of other drivers affect ridership | Interaction when getting on/off affects to DB, emission & noise | Planning bus stop & bus land affects to others perception | A restrictive policy reduces interactions |
13 | Passengers- environment | Bus stop facility affects to safety when passenger gets on/off | Bus stop affects to accessibility when passenger gets on/off | Perception of passenger affects comfort, satisfaction | Interaction time when they get on/off affect to fuel & operating cost | A high-quality outside environment attracts ridership | Interaction when getting on/off affects to DB, emission & noise | Planning of infrastructure, information for passengers | Public investment increases interaction |