Variables | Path coefficients | ||||
Latent | Indicator* | Coefficient | t-statistic | ||
APR | Appropriateness of CC adoption | CRP | CC is correct policy | 1.000 | - |
ACP | CC will be accepted by the public | 0.893 | 39.32 | ||
FRP | CC is a fair policy | 0.878 | 38.13 | ||
REC | Recognition of scheme’s effects | ICG | CC implementation to improve congestion | 1.000 | - |
IGW | CC implementation to mitigate global warming | 0.996 | 56.47 | ||
MCG | CC will be able to mitigate congestion | 0.866 | 42.13 | ||
MEP | CC will be able toto mitigate environmental problem | 0.852 | 40.95 | ||
CDC | Car dependency | CNL | A car is absolutely necessary in daily life | 1.000 | - |
PNL | Public mode is necessary in daily life | 0.783 | 7.14 | ||
PAV | Public mode is easy and convenient to use | −1.072 | −8.59 | ||
APC | Awareness of car society | TGC | Traffic is congested in the CBD | 1.000 | - |
PED | The pedestrian environment is dangerous | 0.723 | 12.81 | ||
IFM | Inhibition of CC implementation | IFD | CC impedes the freedom to drive | 1.000 | - |
DCU | CC will decrease car use | −0.667 | −7.53 | ||
IPU | CC will increase public transit use | −0.996 | −11.68 | ||
DEC | Doubts about the ability of CC policy | DCU | CC will decrease car use | 1.000 | - |
RFV | CC effect on reduce frequency of visits to the CBD | 0.385 | 11.03 | ||
CGW | CC can mitigate congestion and global worming | 0.525 | 12.97 | ||
IPU | CC will increase public transit use | 0.951 | 11.94 |