Census Location | Year | Season Census Done | Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Value | Conclusion | |
Wet Season | Dry Season | ||||
Amboseli | 2010 | 2283 | 1053 | Χ2 = 453.51, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2010, wet season numbers were higher than dry season number. |
2013 | 3470 | 1444 | Χ2 = 835.30, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2013, wet season numbers were higher than dry season number. | |
Chi-Square Value | Χ2 = 244.91, df = 1, p < 0.001 | Χ2 = 61.23, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For each set of wet season, and dry season, the giraffe numbers were significantly higher for 2013 than 2010. | ||
Magadi | 2010 | 780 | 192 | Χ2 = 355.70, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2010, wet season numbers were higher than dry season number. |
2013 | 991 | 815 | Χ2 = 17.15, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2013, wet season numbers were higher than dry season numbers. | |
Chi-Square Value | Χ2 = 25.14, df = 1, p < 0.001 | Χ2 = 385.43, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For each set of wet season, and dry season, the giraffe numbers were significantly higher for 2013 than 2010. | ||
West Kilimanjaro | 2010 | 263 | 216 | Χ2 = 4.61. df = 1, p = 0.032 | For 2010, wet season numbers was higher than dry season number. |
2013 | 119 | 348 | Χ2 = 112.29, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2013, dry season numbers were higher than wet season number. | |
Chi-Square Value | Χ2 = 54.28, df = 1, p < 0.001 | Χ2 = 30.89, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For each set of wet and dry season, the giraffe numbers were different. They were higher in the wet season of 2010, but higher in the dry season of 2013. | ||
Natron | 2010 | 838 | 423 | Χ2 = 136.58, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2010, wet season numbers were higher than dry season number. |
2013 | 623 | 1019 | Χ2 = 95.50, df = 1, p < 0.001 | For 2013, dry season numbers were higher than wet season numbers. | |
Chi-Square Value | Χ2 =31.64, df = 1, p < 0.001 | Χ2 = 246.34 df = 1, p < 0.001 | For each set of wet and dry season, the giraffe numbers were different. They were higher in the wet season of 2010, but higher in the dry season of 2013. |