Author (year)

Sample size

Intervention

Measurement tool

Result

Jamshidi, Hemmati

Maslakpak, and

Parizad (2021)

78 fourth-year nursing students

control and the experimental group

providing them with learning materials about using the PBL method

knowledge of students’, and practice of patient well-being and care highly improved in the experimental than in control group (p = 0.001)

Mogale, (2001b)

first-year nursing students

qualitative, explorative, descriptive study

phases of implantation of problem based learning till formulating guide lines for tutors to guide students’

phases one, two, and three, students’ can use PBL in clinical sitting and there were positive perceptions

González Hernando

et al. (2014)

134 second-year nursing students

Students’ nurses’ satisfaction in problem-based learning, a descriptive transversal study

satisfaction scale was administered under PBL implementation

Satisfaction was high in applying the new methodology of problem-based learning

Hamdan et al.

(2014)

94 third-year students’

quasi-experimental pretests and post-test

examines the association between students’ degree of satisfaction toward PBL and the effectiveness of PBL

outcomes showed significant differences in pretest and post-test scores t (93) = −13.70, p < 0.001

Dorri et al. (2020)

300 hours per semester for the bachelor in nursing to an average of 40 to 50 students per semester

experience details of a learning strategy accepted in nursing care of adults with a course load

provide students with scientific organized knowledge of nursing care of adults in medical and surgical situations by development of case study

responses to the case studies were adequately designated

Khoiriyah and

Husamah

(2018)

18 state junior student

Critical thinking identified and recognized from the conducting grading style, and outcomes from learning were obtained from the writing test

Grading style of problem solving, critical thinking abilities, learning.

PBL increase the estimation of practicing in solving problem by 27% with the achievement rate of 47%, the average of creative thinking abilities of 11% with the achievement rate of 17.5%, and the average end result of the learning of 13% with the achievement rate of 15%

Kaddoura (2011b)

103 students (65 participants from the PBL course and remaining 38 participant from lecture-based learning)

Comparative descriptive study Measure the critical thinking

of the student nurses’ during lecture-based learning methodology or problem-based learning technique.

California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST)

The result appeared that the CCTST grads for the students in the PBL course was greater than lecture-based learning (LBL).

Gonzalez et al. (2020b)

11 participants from senior nursing program

randomized control study participants were rotated between the groups discussing topics related to the fundamental health subject

Kaplan Critical Thinking Integrated Test (KCTIT)

Results showed no difference on the Kaplan Critical Thinking Integrated Test (KCTIT) between participated in the intervention and who did not, t(50) = 0.174, p > 0.05. The data analyses between the students’ who didn’t participate (M = 67.59, SD = 5.81) and the students’ participated (M = 67.88, SD = 5.99) were statistically same