# | Definition | Value |
| Total number of charger type t by year y | Decision Variable |
| Installation and infrastructure cost for a unit of charger type i | Level 2 = 2 K USD; Level 3 = 40 K USD |
| Power of charger type t (based on the existing charging technologies) | Level 2 = 10 kW; Level 3 = 50 kW |
| Daily utilization hours of charger type t (out of 10 hours total daily operation) | Design A: - charger Level 2 = 10 hours - charger Level 3 = 10 hours Design B: - charger Level 2 = 5 hours - charger Level 3 = 10 hours Design C: - charger Level 2 = 5 hours - charger Level 3 = 5 hours |
T | Number of charger types | 2 (Level 2 and Level 3) |
C | Number of EV user categories (Category code-Home charger availability-Battery level upon reaching campus) | Class 1 - Yes - 20% Class 2 - Yes - 40% Class 3 - Yes - 60% Class 4 - Yes - 80% Class 5 - No - 20% Class 6 - No - 40% Class 7 - No - 60% Class 8 - No - 80% |
| Penetration rate of EV in year y (determined based on the stated preference from the conducted survey) | 60% |
| Penetration rate of category c (needs to be identified after the implementation, uniform distribution is used here) | 12.5% (uniform distribution on all 8 categories) |
| Total daily campus inflow in target year y (per year inflow reported by the gates RFID readers) | 15,000 veh/day (12,000 veh/day for 2015 with 5% growth rate till 2020) |
| Battery power (for the new generation of EVs) | 70 kWh |
| Remaining battery life in percentage for category c | Assigned based on C |
| Average electricity usage efficiency of EVs | 0.34 kWh/mile |
| Distance adjustment factor for category c (a safety factor to ensure that the users will have enough battery power to make their trips) | 2 for users with access to EV chargers, and 6 for other users |
| distance traveled by users of distance-distribution category i between their living area and campus (median values) | Refer Figure 3 |
| Frequency of distance-distribution category i | Refer Figure 3 |
D | Number of distance-distribution categories | 6 (refer Figure 3) |