Treatment method | Suitable for | Advantages | Disadvantages | Reference |
Open limestone channels | Pre-treatment or post-treatment | Low operating and maintenance costs, no power consumption, can last for many years, simple and reliable | Coating, long channel required to achieve the desired retention time | [13] |
Aerobic wetlands | Acid water containing Fe, Mn and SS | Low operating and maintenance costs, no power consumption, can last for many years | Cannot treat strongly acidic water efficiently (best for pH > 5.5) | [17] |
Anaerobic wetlands | Acid water with low DO, Al, Fe3+ and SS contents | Low operating and maintenance costs, no power consumption, can last for many years | Coating on limestone surface due to presence of Fe and Al, large area and long retention time needed to remove Mn | [17] |
Anoxic limestone drains | Acid water with low Al and Fe3+ contents | Low operating and maintenance costs, no power consumption, can last for many years, simple | Needs pretreatment, best for acid water with low DO, Al and Fe3+ to avoid armoring | [14] |
Successive alkalinity-producing systems | Acid water with high contents of metals (Fe, Al, Zn, Cu) | Low operating and maintenance costs, no power consumption, can last for many years | Metal floc accumulation and degradation of organic layer, pretreatment required for acid water with high Fe3+ and SS contents | [14] |