Hypothesis No

Hypothesis: Granularity

Hypothesis: Description

Result: Significant

Direction

H1

Overall Period

A person having more contacts in a social network will be more productive.

Yes

Positive

H2

Overall Period

People with more betweenness centrality will have higher productivity than people with less betweenness centrality.

No

Positive

H3

Overall Period

Individuals in cohesive subgroups engage in reciprocity transactions, hence it improves the productive benefits of individuals within the group.

Yes

Positive

H4

Overall Period

Denser networks are more likely to promote the sharing of resources hence produces more productive individuals.

No

Negative

H5

Overall Period

Effective size of a person shows its strength of connection with others, hence improves productivity.

Yes

Positive

H6

Overall Period

The greater the efficiency of an ego network, the greater the role of broker an individual plays, hence individual productivity improves.

Yes

Negative

H7

Overall Period

The constraint measure the level of closure (influence) of an individual within its support network, hence exerts more productivity.

Yes

Positive

H8

Overall Period

An individual’s hierarchical position enables him/her to obtain more opportunities and helps to make best choices, hence it improves individual productivity.

Yes

Negative

H9

Overall Period

Structural hole plays a major role in individual’s career development and advancement, hence makes an individual productive.

Yes

Positive

H1

Daily Basis

The number of strong ties is positively related to productivity.

Yes

Negative

H2

Daily Basis

An individual with high indegree and outdegree is considered to be influential, hence productive.

Yes

Positive