Hypothesis No | Hypothesis: Granularity | Hypothesis: Description | Result: Significant | Direction |
H1 | Overall Period | A person having more contacts in a social network will be more productive. | Yes | Positive |
H2 | Overall Period | People with more betweenness centrality will have higher productivity than people with less betweenness centrality. | No | Positive |
H3 | Overall Period | Individuals in cohesive subgroups engage in reciprocity transactions, hence it improves the productive benefits of individuals within the group. | Yes | Positive |
H4 | Overall Period | Denser networks are more likely to promote the sharing of resources hence produces more productive individuals. | No | Negative |
H5 | Overall Period | Effective size of a person shows its strength of connection with others, hence improves productivity. | Yes | Positive |
H6 | Overall Period | The greater the efficiency of an ego network, the greater the role of broker an individual plays, hence individual productivity improves. | Yes | Negative |
H7 | Overall Period | The constraint measure the level of closure (influence) of an individual within its support network, hence exerts more productivity. | Yes | Positive |
H8 | Overall Period | An individual’s hierarchical position enables him/her to obtain more opportunities and helps to make best choices, hence it improves individual productivity. | Yes | Negative |
H9 | Overall Period | Structural hole plays a major role in individual’s career development and advancement, hence makes an individual productive. | Yes | Positive |
H1 | Daily Basis | The number of strong ties is positively related to productivity. | Yes | Negative |
H2 | Daily Basis | An individual with high indegree and outdegree is considered to be influential, hence productive. | Yes | Positive |