No. | Statements | SD (%) | D (%) | sD (%) | sA (%) | A (%) | SA (%) | Mean | SD | Interpretation |
AP40. | I believe the proposed CEFR levels B1 and B2 for secondary students are suitable. | 3 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.9) | 26 (24.8) | 63 (60.0) | 11 (10.5) | 4.70 | 0.898 | Good |
AP41. | I believe the proposed CEFR levels B1 and B2 that secondary students should achieve upon completion of secondary school are attainable. | 3 (2.9) | 2 (1.9) | 3 (2.9) | 27 (25.7) | 62 (59.0) | 8 (7.6) | 4.59 | 0.958 | Good |
AP46. | I believe CEFR is a suitable framework to be adopted for secondary English syllabus and assessments. | 3 (2.9) | 2 (1.9) | 2 (1.9) | 21 (20.0) | 66 (62.9) | 11 (10.5) | 4.70 | 0.962 | Good |
AP47. | I believe CEFR is an applicable framework to be adopted onto secondary English syllabus and assessments. | 2 (1.9) | 1 (1.0) | 2 (1.9) | 21 (20.0) | 67 (63.8) | 12 (11.4) | 4.77 | 0.858 | Good |
AP52. | CEFR is an applicable framework to help Malaysia meet the economy and global demands. | 3 (2.9) | 4 (3.8) | 6 (5.7) | 22 (21.0) | 60 (57.1) | 10 (9.5) | 4.54 | 1.065 | Good |
AP54. | CEFR should be modified like Japan to ensure its applicability and suitability according to Malaysia context. | 2 (1.9) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.9) | 26 (24.8) | 61 (58.1) | 14 (13.3) | 4.77 | 0.846 | Good |
AP55. | It is highly recommended to adapt and modify CEFR to fit in the Malaysian context with local touch. | 2 (1.9) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.9) | 21 (20.0) | 60 (57.1) | 19 (18.1) | 4.85 | 0.886 | Good |
AP56. | Suitable secondary English textbooks, exercise books and other teaching and learning materials which conform to CEFR levels B1 and B2 are needed. | 2 (1.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 13 (12.4) | 66 (62.9) | 24 (22.9) | 5.03 | 0.814 | Good |