No.

Statements

SD

(%)

D

(%)

sD

(%)

sA

(%)

A

(%)

SA

(%)

Mean

SD

Interpretation

AP40.

I believe the proposed CEFR levels B1 and B2 for secondary students are suitable.

3

(2.9)

0

(0.0)

2

(1.9)

26

(24.8)

63

(60.0)

11

(10.5)

4.70

0.898

Good

AP41.

I believe the proposed CEFR levels B1 and B2 that secondary students should achieve upon completion of secondary school are attainable.

3

(2.9)

2

(1.9)

3

(2.9)

27

(25.7)

62

(59.0)

8

(7.6)

4.59

0.958

Good

AP46.

I believe CEFR is a suitable framework to be adopted for secondary English syllabus and assessments.

3

(2.9)

2

(1.9)

2

(1.9)

21

(20.0)

66

(62.9)

11

(10.5)

4.70

0.962

Good

AP47.

I believe CEFR is an applicable framework to be adopted onto secondary English syllabus and assessments.

2

(1.9)

1

(1.0)

2

(1.9)

21

(20.0)

67

(63.8)

12

(11.4)

4.77

0.858

Good

AP52.

CEFR is an applicable framework to help Malaysia meet the economy and global demands.

3

(2.9)

4

(3.8)

6

(5.7)

22

(21.0)

60

(57.1)

10

(9.5)

4.54

1.065

Good

AP54.

CEFR should be modified like Japan to ensure its applicability and suitability according to Malaysia context.

2

(1.9)

0

(0.0)

2

(1.9)

26

(24.8)

61

(58.1)

14

(13.3)

4.77

0.846

Good

AP55.

It is highly recommended to adapt and modify CEFR to fit in the Malaysian context with local touch.

2

(1.9)

0

(0.0)

3

(2.9)

21

(20.0)

60

(57.1)

19

(18.1)

4.85

0.886

Good

AP56.

Suitable secondary English textbooks, exercise books and other teaching and learning materials which conform to CEFR levels B1 and B2 are needed.

2

(1.9)

0

(0.0)

0

(0.0)

13

(12.4)

66

(62.9)

24

(22.9)

5.03

0.814

Good