Perceived Internal Driver Indicators

Mean

Interpretation

1. To improve quality teaching and learning

3.3667

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

2. To improve Board Exam results

3.3333

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

3. To improve departmental efficiency

3.3333

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

4. To improve departmental image or prestige

3.2500

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

5. To become more competitive

3.3167

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

6. To improve communication within the department

3.2667

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

7. To improve communication between departments

3.2167

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

8. To improve the quality of work life for our departmental employees

3.2000

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were more evident.

9. Because of dissatisfaction with past practices

3.2667

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.

OVERALL MEAN

3.2833

It indicates that the drivers to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were most evident.