High Outcome | Medium Outcome | Low Outcome |
b1 | b3 | b2 |
b1 = 129 | b3 = not b1 and not b2 = 13 | b2 = -b1 = 11 |
“Yes” as the maximized TOV [b1 = 129] according to the TOV Totals. | 153/13 for a ratio of 11.7692: 1 (with 1 implied) 11.7692 times more likely to be “Unknown” than to be a “Yes” or a “No” response replicated under the same conditions over time. | 153/11 for a ratio of 13.909090…: 1 (with 1 implied) 13.909090… times more likely to be “No” than to be a “Yes” or an “Unknown” response replicated under the same conditions over time. |
of b1 = 129/153 | of b3 = 13/153 | of b2 = 11/153 |
Significant similarities of the Within Tri-Square Test Proportionate Mean Data for b1 respectively as θ1: | Significant similarities of the Within Tri-Square Test Proportionate Mean Data for b3 respectively as θ2: | Significant similarities of the Within Tri-Square Test Proportionate Mean Data for b2 respectively as θ3: |
[0.843137255 = 84.3137255% | 0.0849673202 = 8.49673202% | 0.0718954248 = 7.18954248%] |
The Final Insight Trend Analysis using TRIASIM (Trichotomous Analysis of Similarity) calculations to determine the prevalence of a particular TOV in this particular case has a Grand Total of [b1÷ b3 + b2] = 129/24 = 5.375 which yields a ratio of 5.375: 1, which means that there are 5.375 times more likely to have a response of “Yes” to the aforementioned initial Tri-Squared Research items than a response of “Unknown” or “No” replicated under the same conditions over time. |