| Socio-Demo | Frequency | Percentage |
| How would you rate the effectiveness of leadership in the United States in the post-COVID era? | ||
| Very Ineffective | 3 | 4.8 |
| Ineffective | 13 | 20.6 |
| Neutral | 8 | 12.7 |
| Effective | 28 | 44.4 |
| Very Effective | 11 | 17.5 |
| Total | 63 | 100.0 |
| To what extent do you believe that leadership decisions have positively influenced economic prosperity in the post-COVID era? | ||
| Strongly Negative | 4 | 6.3 |
| Somewhat Negative | 11 | 17.5 |
| Neutral | 9 | 14.3 |
| Somewhat Positive | 26 | 41.3 |
| Strongly Positive | 13 | 20.6 |
| Total | 63 | 100.0 |
| In your opinion, to what extent has leadership in the United States effectively communicated its strategies for economic recovery post-COVID to the general public? | ||
| Very Ineffectively | 3 | 4.8 |
| Ineffectively | 10 | 15.9 |
| Neutral | 6 | 9.5 |
| Effectively | 26 | 41.3 |
| Very Effectively | 18 | 28.6 |
| Total | 63 | 100.0 |
| The level of inclusivity and representation in leadership initiatives aimed at economic recovery post-COVID, considering diverse perspectives and demographics | ||
| Very Inclusive | 5 | 7.9 |
| Inclusive | 9 | 14.3 |
| Neutral | 10 | 15.9 |
| Exclusive | 25 | 39.7 |
| Very Exclusive | 14 | 22.2 |
| Total | 63 | 100.0 |