Hypothesis

Translation of voluminous books

Learning quality

Low

Average

High

Total sum

First hypothesis:

Relation of voluminous books with learning quality

Yes

4

16

60

80

44%

53%

70%

No

5

14

26

45

56%

47%

30%

Total

9

30

86

125

Result of test

Alfa = 5%

Df = 2

X2m = 9/544

Sig = 0/005

Intensity of relation

0/18

Kramer’s v

Sig = 0/005

Second hypothesis:

Relation of translation of educated translators in foreign countries with learning quality

Educated translators in foreign countries

Learning quality

Low

Average

High

Total sum

Yes

4

14

59

77

36%

58%

66%

No

7

10

31

48

64%

42%

34%

Total

11

24

90

125

Result of test

Alfa = 5%

Df = 2

X2m = 7/42

Sig = 0/004

Intensity of relation

0/15

Kramer’s v

Sig = 0/004

Third hypothesis:

Relation between translation of translators in language major with learning quality

Translators of language discipline

Learning quality

Low

Average

High

Total sum

Yes

4

15

66

85

33%

60%

75%

No

8

10

22

40

67%

40%

25%

Total

12

25

88

125

Result of test

Alfa = 5%

Df = 2

X2m = 16/07

Sig = 0/001

Intensity of relation

0/23

Kramer’s v

Sig = 0/001

Fourth hypothesis:

Relation of illustrated books translation with learning quality

Translators of illustrated books

Learning quality

Low

Average

High

Total sum

Yes

2

15

63

80

31%

50%

71%

No

4

15

26

45

69%

50%

29%

Total

6

30

89

125

Result of test

Alfa = 5%

Df = 2

X2m = 11/14

Sig = 0/004

Intensity of relation

0/18

Kramer’s v

Sig = 0/004

Fifth hypothesis:

Relation between group translation with learning quality

Group translation

Learning quality

Low

Average

High

Total sum

Yes

3

11

84

98

70%

62%

81%

No

1

6

20

27

30%

38%

19%

Total

7

1

125

Result of test

Alfa = 5%

Df = 2

X2m = 13/45

Sig = 0/005

Intensity of relation

0/21

Kramer’s v

Sig = 0/005