Path b1 (emotions → resilience) | .14 (.68) | .11, .17 | 10.04 | <.001 |
Path c’ (social support → resilience) | .05 (.05) | −.03, .12 | 1.27 | .207 |
R2 = .15 for total effect. Sobel z = 6.76, p < .001 for indirect effect. Ratio of indirect to total effect = .81. | ||||
Resilience, as predicted by overall perceived social support, with overall positive emotions as a mediator, for the public university sample (n = 190) | ||||
Total effect for social support | .18 (.33) | .12, .24 | 5.93 | <.001 |
Direct effect for social support | .04 (.05) | −.03, .12 | 1.13 | .259 |
Indirect effect through emotions | .14 (.28) | .09, .20 |
|
|
Path a1 (social support → emotions) | 1.50 (.62) | 1.21, 1.80 | 10.13 | <.001 |
Path b1 (emotions → resilience) | .09 (.45) | .06, .12 | 5.68 | <.001 |
Path c’ (social support → resilience) | .04 (.05) | −.03, .12 | 1.13 | .259 |
R2 = .14 for total effect. Sobel z = 4.94, p < .001 for indirect effect. Ratio of indirect to total effect = .76. |