Question A': Τhe percentage of teachers’ satisfaction with the use (integration and implementation) of I.C.T. before and after COVID-19 (Table 1) | Question B': Τhe percentage of teachers’ satisfaction with the educational success of I.C.T.s’ tools before and after COVID-19 (Table 2) |
52.5% considered that the students’ knowledge was significantly enhanced by the use of I.C.T. (Var2) compared to 48% after COVID-19 | - |
40% of teachers both before and after COVID-19 believed that the use of I.C.T. was ideal in theory courses (Var6) | 47.5% of teachers before COVID-19 believed that the use of I.C.T. was ideal in theory courses (Var6), versus 64% post-COVID-19 |
50% thought I.C.T. was suitable for laboratory courses (Var7) versus 38.5% post-COVID-19 | 60.9% thought I.C.T. was suitable for laboratory courses (Var7) versus 51.3% post-COVID-19 |
38.8% of teachers systematically used I.C.T. in their teaching after the end of the program (Var3) compared to 44% after COVID-19 | 40% of teachers systematically used I.C.T. in their teaching after the end of the program (Var3) compared to 50% after COVID-19 |
36.3% claimed that with the implementation of I.C.T. the quality of the provided teaching was improved, the same is applied to adult education (Var25) | 53.8% claimed that with the implementation of I.C.T. the quality of the provided teaching was improved, the same is applied to adult education (Var25) |