Thomson 2017 [25] | Was the study question or objective clearly stated? | No |
|
Were eligibility/selection criteria for the study population prespecified and clearly described? | No |
| |
Were the participants in the study representative of those who would be eligible for the test/service/intervention in the general or clinical population of interest? | No |
| |
Were all eligible participants that met the prespecified entry criteria enrolled? | Not reported |
| |
Was the sample size sufficiently large to provide confidence in the findings? | Yes |
| |
Was the test/service/intervention clearly described and delivered consistently across the study population? | No |
| |
Were the outcome measures prespecified, clearly defined, valid, reliable, and assessed consistently across all study participants? | No |
| |
Were the people assessing the outcomes blinded to the participants’ exposures/interventions? | Yes |
| |
Was the loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less? Were those lost to follow-up accounted for in the analysis? | N/A |
| |
Did the statistical methods examine changes in outcome measures from before to after the intervention? Were statistical tests done that provided p values for the pre-to-post changes? | No |
| |
Were outcome measures of interest taken multiple times before the intervention and multiple times after the intervention (i.e., did they use an interrupted time-series design)? | Yes | Outcome measures were only taken once at pre, mid and post intervention. | |
If the intervention was conducted at a group level (e.g., a whole hospital, a community, etc.) did the statistical analysis take into account the use of individual-level data to determine effects at the group level? | No |
|